U Ministry Utility
50“api.repos description: "SvelteKit + Supabase youth ministry leader-allocation & coverage tool" (fetch date 2026-09-28)”
source unavailable
987tom1/youth-allocation-app
SvelteKit + Supabase youth ministry leader-allocation & coverage tool
Trust Score
20.0
Last full review 2026-09-28 · Trust Score decays −2 points per month without a fresh review (never below 20)
security cap applied — score capped at 45U Ministry Utility
50“api.repos description: "SvelteKit + Supabase youth ministry leader-allocation & coverage tool" (fetch date 2026-09-28)”
source unavailable
M Maturity
25“api.repos: created_at 2026-06-01, pushed_at 2026-06-10; latest_commit date 2026-06-10; api.releases: no tagged release found…”
source unavailable
20.0 → 20.0 (+0.0 over window)
ranked #8 of 10 in M10 (▼2 vs previous snapshot)
987tom1/youth-allocation-app looks like a candidate for kids, youth & volunteers; No README content in pack; adoption and agent signals unfetched: Dockerfile/registry/demo, openapi/CITATION.cff
Use it with
Selected: Gloo AI Studio
Tool names and logos belong to their owners; shown so you can pick your own client. Not affiliated.
Step 1 — Connect Refinry once (prompt only)
Gloo AI Studio does not document external MCP server setup. Use this prompt with the copied Refinry research brief in Studio.
https://studio.ai.gloo.com/I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s plain-language agent feed — https://refinry.dev/docs.md — then help me evaluate 987tom1/youth-allocation-app: summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Some clients need manual setup. Follow the plain-language steps on the Docs page.
Step 2 — Plan your first step
Tell the AI what you want to do; edit this to match your situation.
I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s public review of 987tom1/youth-allocation-app (https://refinry.dev) and help me assess it for using 987tom1/youth-allocation-app for kids, youth & volunteers in my ministry. Summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites, separating reviewed evidence from what still needs verification. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Prefer a hand-off that works without a connection? Copy the research brief: every reviewed fact, all caution flags, and a feasibility-only first assignment.
S Security / License
0license 0 · security 25
“api.repos: license.spdx_id null; security: osv_vulns [], security_md present false (fetch date 2026-09-28)”
source unavailable
A Ease of Adoption
0dev 0 · volunteer 0
“readme excerpt is empty: <<<BEGIN README EXCERPT>>> <<<END README EXCERPT>>> (fetch date 2026-09-28)”
source unavailable
C Community Trust
0“api.repos: stargazers_count 0, forks_count 0, open_issues_count 0; api.contributors: only 987tom1 (fetch date 2026-09-28)”
source unavailable
I AI-Agent Integrability
25“api.repos: description identifies SvelteKit + Supabase tool; readme excerpt empty; no license SPDX; no API description (fetch date…”
source unavailable