U Ministry Utility
50“api.repos + README : "Text-Fabric dataset of the Greek New Testament, based on the Nestle 1904 (7th printing) edition." and "enabling…”
source unavailable · fetched 2026-10-06
CenterBLC/N1904
Text-Fabric dataset of the Greek New Testament, based on the Nestle 1904 (7th printing) edition.
Trust Score
38.8
Last full review 2026-10-06 · Trust Score decays −2 points per month without a fresh review (never below 20)
security cap applied — score capped at 45U Ministry Utility
50“api.repos + README : "Text-Fabric dataset of the Greek New Testament, based on the Nestle 1904 (7th printing) edition." and "enabling…”
source unavailable · fetched 2026-10-06
M Maturity
25“api.releases : "latest tag 1.0.0 published 2024-07-28"; latest_commit: "date: 2026-03-20"; security: "commits_90d": 0. Last activity is…”
source unavailable · fetched 2026-10-06
CenterBLC/N1904 looks like a candidate for data & text corpora; D3 applied: this is a static scripture dataset (Text-Fabric), not a served API, so primary category = M9 Ministry Data & Theology Resources (not G1); general lane G3 Data & Text Corpora fits the syntax-tree corpus.
Use it with
Selected: Gloo AI Studio
Tool names and logos belong to their owners; shown so you can pick your own client. Not affiliated.
Step 1 — Connect Refinry once (prompt only)
Gloo AI Studio does not document external MCP server setup. Use this prompt with the copied Refinry research brief in Studio.
https://studio.ai.gloo.com/I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s plain-language agent feed — https://refinry.dev/docs.md — then help me evaluate CenterBLC/N1904: summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Some clients need manual setup. Follow the plain-language steps on the Docs page.
Step 2 — Plan your first step
Tell the AI what you want to do; edit this to match your situation.
I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s public review of CenterBLC/N1904 (https://refinry.dev) and help me assess it for using CenterBLC/N1904 for data & text corpora in my ministry. Summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites, separating reviewed evidence from what still needs verification. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Prefer a hand-off that works without a connection? Copy the research brief: every reviewed fact, all caution flags, and a feasibility-only first assignment.
S Security / License
25license 75 · security 25
“License: api.repos "license.spdx_id": "MIT" and README badge "License: MIT" — permissive, but no license/dependency scan is evidenced in…”
source unavailable · fetched 2026-10-06
A Ease of Adoption
25dev 50 · volunteer 25
“README : "enabling linguistic and textual analytics through the Python package Text-Fabric" plus docs badge "docs-%F0%9F%93%96" and "1.0.0…”
source unavailable · fetched 2026-10-06
C Community Trust
50“api.contributors : top includes "saulocantanhede", "contributions": 4 and "oliverglanz", "contributions": 1 alongside "tonyjurg"…”
source · fetched 2026-10-06
I AI-Agent Integrability
75“README : "This Github repository houses a comprehensive dataset... through the Python package Text-Fabric" with structured docs link "" and…”
source · fetched 2026-10-06