U Ministry Utility
50“README: 'A Bible server written in Rust using Actix Web and Diesel' ... 'I built Bible.rs to be a simple, fast, and usable window into the…”
source unavailable
DSpeckhals/bible.rs
A Bible server written in Rust using Actix Web and Diesel
Trust Score
43.0
Last full review 2026-09-28 · Trust Score decays −2 points per month without a fresh review (never below 20)
U Ministry Utility
50“README: 'A Bible server written in Rust using Actix Web and Diesel' ... 'I built Bible.rs to be a simple, fast, and usable window into the…”
source unavailable
M Maturity
25“api.releases: 'no tagged release found'; api.contributors: single dominant contributor (DSpeckhals 78, next human SamuelMarks 1)…”
source unavailable
45.0 → 45.0 (+0.0 over window)
ranked #1 of 6 in G1 (▲1 vs previous snapshot)
DSpeckhals/bible.rs looks like a candidate for apis & web services; No tagged release ever (api.releases) — bus-factor risk given single dominant contributor (78 of ~80 human contributions).
Use it with
Selected: Gloo AI Studio
Tool names and logos belong to their owners; shown so you can pick your own client. Not affiliated.
Step 1 — Connect Refinry once (prompt only)
Gloo AI Studio does not document external MCP server setup. Use this prompt with the copied Refinry research brief in Studio.
https://studio.ai.gloo.com/I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s plain-language agent feed — https://refinry.dev/docs.md — then help me evaluate DSpeckhals/bible.rs: summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Some clients need manual setup. Follow the plain-language steps on the Docs page.
Step 2 — Plan your first step
Tell the AI what you want to do; edit this to match your situation.
I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s public review of DSpeckhals/bible.rs (https://refinry.dev) and help me assess it for using DSpeckhals/bible.rs for apis & web services in my ministry. Summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites, separating reviewed evidence from what still needs verification. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Prefer a hand-off that works without a connection? Copy the research brief: every reviewed fact, all caution flags, and a feasibility-only first assignment.
S Security / License
50license 75 · security 50
“api.repos.license: 'MIT' (permissive, but pack has no dep-license scan). security: 'osv_vulns: []', 'security_md: {"present": false}'…”
source unavailable
A Ease of Adoption
50dev 50 · volunteer 50
“README Docker section: 'git clone --recurse-submodules' then 'docker build -t biblers . && docker run -p 8080:8080 --rm -it bi...' — a near…”
source
C Community Trust
50“api.repos: 'stargazers_count": 226, "forks_count": 27'; api.contributors shows external contributor 'SamuelMarks' (1 contribution) —…”
source unavailable
I AI-Agent Integrability
50“README: 'The HTML is meant to be semantic and thus easily machine parsable', obvious URL scheme ('e.g. Psalm/119/105'), accurate…”
source unavailable