U Ministry Utility
75“README: '성도 관리, 구역 조직, 예산 수립, 회계 전표 처리 및 결산/기부금 영수증 발급까지 교회의 모든 행정 및 재정 업무를 완벽히 디지털화한 SaaS 기반의 올인원 스마트 교회 재정 관리 플랫폼' (2026-09-28)”
source unavailable
HyungminJi/church-finance-app
church-finance-app
Trust Score
36.2
Last full review 2026-10-06 · Trust Score decays −2 points per month without a fresh review (never below 20)
U Ministry Utility
75“README: '성도 관리, 구역 조직, 예산 수립, 회계 전표 처리 및 결산/기부금 영수증 발급까지 교회의 모든 행정 및 재정 업무를 완벽히 디지털화한 SaaS 기반의 올인원 스마트 교회 재정 관리 플랫폼' (2026-09-28)”
source unavailable
M Maturity
25“api.repos: pushed_at 2026-09-03, created_at 2026-02-27; api.releases: no tagged release found; api.contributors: single contributor…”
source unavailable
HyungminJi/church-finance-app looks like a candidate for giving & donations; No tagged release, single contributor, no security policy, no install docs — maturity and adoption are fragile.
Use it with
Selected: Gloo AI Studio
Tool names and logos belong to their owners; shown so you can pick your own client. Not affiliated.
Step 1 — Connect Refinry once (prompt only)
Gloo AI Studio does not document external MCP server setup. Use this prompt with the copied Refinry research brief in Studio.
https://studio.ai.gloo.com/I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s plain-language agent feed — https://refinry.dev/docs.md — then help me evaluate HyungminJi/church-finance-app: summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Some clients need manual setup. Follow the plain-language steps on the Docs page.
Step 2 — Plan your first step
Tell the AI what you want to do; edit this to match your situation.
I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s public review of HyungminJi/church-finance-app (https://refinry.dev) and help me assess it for using HyungminJi/church-finance-app for giving & donations in my ministry. Summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites, separating reviewed evidence from what still needs verification. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Prefer a hand-off that works without a connection? Copy the research brief: every reviewed fact, all caution flags, and a feasibility-only first assignment.
S Security / License
50license 75 · security 50
“api.repos: license.spdx_id 'MIT'; security: osv_vulns [] but security_md.present false; no dependency-update tooling or SAST mentioned in…”
source unavailable
A Ease of Adoption
0dev 25 · volunteer 0
“README: tech stack listed (Nuxt 3, PostgreSQL, Kysely) but no install/run instructions, no Dockerfile, no quickstart; adoption: unfetched…”
source unavailable
C Community Trust
0“api.repos: stargazers_count 0, forks_count 0, open_issues_count 0; api.contributors: only HyungminJi (2026-09-28)”
source unavailable
I AI-Agent Integrability
25“README: detailed feature and architecture description but no API docs, no OpenAPI, no machine-readable metadata; agent: unfetched…”
source unavailable