U Ministry Utility
25“"Free and open source video editor, based on MLT Framework and KDE Frameworks" (api.repos.description) — a general-purpose video editor…”
source unavailable
KDE/kdenlive
Free and open source video editor, based on MLT Framework and KDE Frameworks
Trust Score
45.0
Last full review 2026-10-06 · Trust Score decays −2 points per month without a fresh review (never below 20)
security cap applied — score capped at 45U Ministry Utility
25“"Free and open source video editor, based on MLT Framework and KDE Frameworks" (api.repos.description) — a general-purpose video editor…”
source unavailable
M Maturity
75“"pushed_at": "2026-10-03T21:15:59Z" and "commits_90d": 135 (api.repos, security); "There you can also find downloads for both stable…”
source unavailable
KDE/kdenlive looks like a candidate for desktop applications; api.releases shows 'no tagged release found (unfetched-or-none)' — releases exist via kdenlive.org per README, but pack evidence is thin; if confirmed regular releases, M could reach 100 with governance evidence (unfetched: CHANGELOG/roadmap/CI).
Use it with
Selected: Gloo AI Studio
Tool names and logos belong to their owners; shown so you can pick your own client. Not affiliated.
Step 1 — Connect Refinry once (prompt only)
Gloo AI Studio does not document external MCP server setup. Use this prompt with the copied Refinry research brief in Studio.
https://studio.ai.gloo.com/I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s plain-language agent feed — https://refinry.dev/docs.md — then help me evaluate KDE/kdenlive: summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Some clients need manual setup. Follow the plain-language steps on the Docs page.
Step 2 — Plan your first step
Tell the AI what you want to do; edit this to match your situation.
I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s public review of KDE/kdenlive (https://refinry.dev) and help me assess it for using KDE/kdenlive for desktop applications in my ministry. Summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites, separating reviewed evidence from what still needs verification. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Prefer a hand-off that works without a connection? Copy the research brief: every reviewed fact, all caution flags, and a feasibility-only first assignment.
S Security / License
25license 25 · security 50
“"license.spdx_id": "GPL-3.0" (api.repos) — GPL-3.0 is restrictive for SaaS/redistribution → license 25. Security: "osv_vulns": [] with…”
source unavailable
A Ease of Adoption
50dev 50 · volunteer 75
“Developer: "Check out our [build instructions](dev-docs/build.md) to set up your development environment" (README). Volunteer: "downloads…”
source unavailable
C Community Trust
100“"forks_count": 524, "stargazers_count": 5788 (api.repos); mature multi-contributor history since "created_at": "2015-09-18"; hosted under…”
source unavailable
I AI-Agent Integrability
50“Accurate README with install/use/contributing sections; license machine-identifiable via "license.spdx_id": "GPL-3.0"; structured developer…”
source unavailable