U Ministry Utility
50“"Church media presentation software" [api.repos description] — directly serves the worship presentation ministry category (M3), but the…”
source unavailable
SoftProjector/softprojector
Church media presentation software
Trust Score
29.2
Last full review 2026-09-27 · Trust Score decays −2 points per month without a fresh review (never below 20)
security cap applied — score capped at 45U Ministry Utility
50“"Church media presentation software" [api.repos description] — directly serves the worship presentation ministry category (M3), but the…”
source unavailable
M Maturity
25“Latest tagged release is "v2.2 published 2017-11-08" [api.releases] while latest commit is "2025-09-16T21:42:55Z" with message "Migration…”
source unavailable
45.0 → 31.2 (-13.8 over window)
ranked #6 of 10 in M3
SoftProjector/softprojector looks like a candidate for worship presentation; No tagged release since v2.2 (2017-11-08) despite commits through 2025-09-16; the project is alive but release discipline is absent.
Use it with
Selected: Gloo AI Studio
Tool names and logos belong to their owners; shown so you can pick your own client. Not affiliated.
Step 1 — Connect Refinry once (prompt only)
Gloo AI Studio does not document external MCP server setup. Use this prompt with the copied Refinry research brief in Studio.
https://studio.ai.gloo.com/I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s plain-language agent feed — https://refinry.dev/docs.md — then help me evaluate SoftProjector/softprojector: summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Some clients need manual setup. Follow the plain-language steps on the Docs page.
Step 2 — Plan your first step
Tell the AI what you want to do; edit this to match your situation.
I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s public review of SoftProjector/softprojector (https://refinry.dev) and help me assess it for using SoftProjector/softprojector for worship presentation in my ministry. Summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites, separating reviewed evidence from what still needs verification. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Prefer a hand-off that works without a connection? Copy the research brief: every reviewed fact, all caution flags, and a feasibility-only first assignment.
S Security / License
25license 25 · security 25
“License is "GPL-3.0" [api.repos] — copyleft, restrictive for ministry SaaS/redistribution ambitions => license sub-score 25. Security…”
source unavailable
A Ease of Adoption
25dev 50 · volunteer 25
“README states only: "To compile the code, build your project in IDE of your choice, copy the EXE it produces to a folder. Run the following…”
source unavailable
C Community Trust
25“Contributors show "vladozar, contributions 74", "ge022, contributions 4", "ItsSK, contributions 3" [api.contributors] — effectively…”
source unavailable
I AI-Agent Integrability
25“README excerpt contains only a build instruction fragment with no install/use sections, no API or CLI description, no structured docs…”
source unavailable