U Ministry Utility
0“README: "The agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude…”
source unavailable
affaan-m/ECC
The agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude Code, Codex, Opencode, Cursor and beyond.
Trust Score
26.2
Last full review 2026-10-06 · Trust Score decays −2 points per month without a fresh review (never below 20)
security cap applied — score capped at 45U Ministry Utility
0“README: "The agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude…”
source unavailable
M Maturity
50“api.releases: "latest tag v2.2.3 published 2026-10-01T23:00:36Z"; latest_commit dated "2026-10-02T02:01:14Z" — tagged release plus commit…”
source unavailable
affaan-m/ECC looks like a candidate for ai, agents & mcp servers; Zero ministry lane fits generously; this is an LLM/agent developer harness (Claude Code/Codex tooling), not ministry software — candidate category hint correctly empty.
Use it with
Selected: Gloo AI Studio
Tool names and logos belong to their owners; shown so you can pick your own client. Not affiliated.
Step 1 — Connect Refinry once (prompt only)
Gloo AI Studio does not document external MCP server setup. Use this prompt with the copied Refinry research brief in Studio.
https://studio.ai.gloo.com/I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s plain-language agent feed — https://refinry.dev/docs.md — then help me evaluate affaan-m/ECC: summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Some clients need manual setup. Follow the plain-language steps on the Docs page.
Step 2 — Plan your first step
Tell the AI what you want to do; edit this to match your situation.
I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s public review of affaan-m/ECC (https://refinry.dev) and help me assess it for using affaan-m/ECC for ai, agents & mcp servers in my ministry. Summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites, separating reviewed evidence from what still needs verification. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Prefer a hand-off that works without a connection? Copy the research brief: every reviewed fact, all caution flags, and a feasibility-only first assignment.
S Security / License
0license 75 · security 0
“License: api.repos "license.spdx_id": "MIT" and README badge "MIT license" → 75. Security: pack states "unfetched…”
source unavailable
A Ease of Adoption
25dev 50 · volunteer 25
“README shows package-manager distribution ("npmjs.com/package/ecc-universal", npm downloads badge) and a GitHub App — developer-adoptable…”
source unavailable
C Community Trust
50“api.repos: "stargazers_count": 272551, "forks_count": 40689, "open_issues_count": 340; README shows Discord community and sponsors (commit…”
source unavailable
I AI-Agent Integrability
75“README: MIT badge (SPDX-identifiable), npm package "ecc-universal" with manifest metadata, stable tagged release "v2.2.3", multilingual…”
source unavailable