U Ministry Utility
25“README: 'A self-hosted, open-source video and audio downloader with a clean web UI. Paste links from YouTube, TikTok, Instagram...' — no…”
source unavailable
averygan/reclip
Download videos from almost any website. Lightweight, self-hosted media downloader with a clean web UI.
Trust Score
26.8
Last full review 2026-09-29 · Trust Score decays −2 points per month without a fresh review (never below 20)
security cap applied — score capped at 45U Ministry Utility
25“README: 'A self-hosted, open-source video and audio downloader with a clean web UI. Paste links from YouTube, TikTok, Instagram...' — no…”
source unavailable
M Maturity
25“api.repos created 2026-03-31, pushed_at 2026-07-09 (commit within 6 months); api.releases: 'no tagged release found'; latest_commit 'Fix…”
source unavailable
28.8 → 28.8 (+0.0 over window)
ranked #3 of 5 in G8 (▼1 vs previous snapshot)
averygan/reclip looks like a candidate for media & audiovisual processing; U=0: zero ministry functionality; keyword 'church/faith' absent entirely — general media (audio/video) tool only.
Use it with
Selected: Gloo AI Studio
Tool names and logos belong to their owners; shown so you can pick your own client. Not affiliated.
Step 1 — Connect Refinry once (prompt only)
Gloo AI Studio does not document external MCP server setup. Use this prompt with the copied Refinry research brief in Studio.
https://studio.ai.gloo.com/I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s plain-language agent feed — https://refinry.dev/docs.md — then help me evaluate averygan/reclip: summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Some clients need manual setup. Follow the plain-language steps on the Docs page.
Step 2 — Plan your first step
Tell the AI what you want to do; edit this to match your situation.
I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s public review of averygan/reclip (https://refinry.dev) and help me assess it for using averygan/reclip for media & audiovisual processing in my ministry. Summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites, separating reviewed evidence from what still needs verification. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Prefer a hand-off that works without a connection? Copy the research brief: every reviewed fact, all caution flags, and a feasibility-only first assignment.
S Security / License
0license 75 · security 0
“api.repos.license.spdx_id: 'MIT'; README: '[MIT](LICENSE)'; security: 'unfetched: SECURITY.md/dependabot/CodeQL/OSV not in pack'…”
source unavailable
A Ease of Adoption
50dev 50 · volunteer 50
“README Quick Start: 'brew install yt-dlp ffmpeg ... ./reclip.sh' then 'Or with Docker: docker build -t reclip . && docker run -p 8899:8899…”
source
C Community Trust
50“api.repos: stargazers_count 10506, forks_count 1557, open_issues_count 68 — forks and open issue reporters exist, but no fetched evidence…”
source unavailable
I AI-Agent Integrability
50“README accurate with Quick Start/Usage/Stack sections; 'License MIT' badge and LICENSE link; API surface implied by latest_commit…”
source unavailable