U Ministry Utility
25“README: 'The text-to-cad plugin gives your agent local workflows for generating 3D models as STEP, GLB, STL or 3MF files.' No ministry…”
source unavailable
earthtojake/text-to-cad
Give your agent CAD superpowers.
Trust Score
43.8
Last full review 2026-10-06 · Trust Score decays −2 points per month without a fresh review (never below 20)
U Ministry Utility
25“README: 'The text-to-cad plugin gives your agent local workflows for generating 3D models as STEP, GLB, STL or 3MF files.' No ministry…”
source unavailable
M Maturity
50“api.releases: 'latest tag v0.7.15 published 2026-10-06T05:45:19Z'; latest_commit dated '2026-10-06' with message 'Release 0.7.15 (#559)…”
source unavailable
S Security / License
earthtojake/text-to-cad looks like a candidate for ai, agents & mcp servers; unfetched: contributors — blocks M>=75 and C>=50 assessment
Use it with
Selected: Gloo AI Studio
Tool names and logos belong to their owners; shown so you can pick your own client. Not affiliated.
Step 1 — Connect Refinry once (prompt only)
Gloo AI Studio does not document external MCP server setup. Use this prompt with the copied Refinry research brief in Studio.
https://studio.ai.gloo.com/I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s plain-language agent feed — https://refinry.dev/docs.md — then help me evaluate earthtojake/text-to-cad: summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Some clients need manual setup. Follow the plain-language steps on the Docs page.
Step 2 — Plan your first step
Tell the AI what you want to do; edit this to match your situation.
I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s public review of earthtojake/text-to-cad (https://refinry.dev) and help me assess it for using earthtojake/text-to-cad for ai, agents & mcp servers in my ministry. Summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites, separating reviewed evidence from what still needs verification. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Prefer a hand-off that works without a connection? Copy the research brief: every reviewed fact, all caution flags, and a feasibility-only first assignment.
license 75 · security 50
“api.repos: '"license.spdx_id": "MIT"' and README badge 'License: MIT' (permissive; dep scan not evidenced). Security posture unfetched…”
source unavailable
A Ease of Adoption
50dev 50 · volunteer 50
“README: 'Send this message to your agent and it will install text-to-cad for you.' plus 'CAD runs through [uv]... check that it is…”
source unavailable
C Community Trust
25“api.repos: 'stargazers_count': 17681, 'forks_count': 1783, open_issues 36; README links Discord. Stars/forks are a weak input only; no…”
source unavailable
I AI-Agent Integrability
75“README: 'the skills and CAD's viewer, a local server (cadgen mcp)' — MCP server present; 'supported by all popular agents that support…”
source unavailable