U Ministry Utility
25“README: 'Material Design icons by Google (Material Symbols)' — a general-purpose icon set with zero ministry features; a church tech team…”
source unavailable
google/material-design-icons
Material Design icons by Google (Material Symbols)
Trust Score
40.0
Last full review 2026-10-06 · Trust Score decays −2 points per month without a fresh review (never below 20)
U Ministry Utility
25“README: 'Material Design icons by Google (Material Symbols)' — a general-purpose icon set with zero ministry features; a church tech team…”
source unavailable
M Maturity
50“api.repos: pushed_at 2026-10-02, latest_commit 2026-10-02 'Update Symbols' — active within 6 months; api.releases: 'latest tag 4.0.0…”
source unavailable
google/material-design-icons looks like a candidate for design, templates & themes; No ministry fit even generously — pure general-purpose design asset; classified general-only per D6 taxonomy rule, G9 (Design, Templates & Themes).
Use it with
Selected: Gloo AI Studio
Tool names and logos belong to their owners; shown so you can pick your own client. Not affiliated.
Step 1 — Connect Refinry once (prompt only)
Gloo AI Studio does not document external MCP server setup. Use this prompt with the copied Refinry research brief in Studio.
https://studio.ai.gloo.com/I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s plain-language agent feed — https://refinry.dev/docs.md — then help me evaluate google/material-design-icons: summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Some clients need manual setup. Follow the plain-language steps on the Docs page.
Step 2 — Plan your first step
Tell the AI what you want to do; edit this to match your situation.
I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s public review of google/material-design-icons (https://refinry.dev) and help me assess it for using google/material-design-icons for design, templates & themes in my ministry. Summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites, separating reviewed evidence from what still needs verification. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Prefer a hand-off that works without a connection? Copy the research brief: every reviewed fact, all caution flags, and a feasibility-only first assignment.
S Security / License
50license 75 · security 50
“License: api.repos 'license.spdx_id: Apache-2.0' — permissive, but pack shows no bundled-dep license scan, so 75 not 100. Security…”
source unavailable
A Ease of Adoption
25dev 50 · volunteer 25
“README: 'The icons can be browsed in a more user-friendly way at ' — a developer can fetch/download icons easily; but install path is…”
source
C Community Trust
50“api.repos: 'stargazers_count: 54072, forks_count: 9748' plus api.contributors with multiple distinct committers ('jestelle', 'tphinney'…”
source unavailable
I AI-Agent Integrability
50“README is accurate with use guidance ('The icons can be browsed... at ') and license is machine-identifiable via api.repos 'spdx_id…”
source