U Ministry Utility
25“README: 'A free open source IT asset/license management system' ... 'asset management in IT Operations. Knowing who has which laptop, when…”
source unavailable
grokability/snipe-it
A free open source IT asset/license management system
Trust Score
45.0
Last full review 2026-10-06 · Trust Score decays −2 points per month without a fresh review (never below 20)
security cap applied — score capped at 45U Ministry Utility
25“README: 'A free open source IT asset/license management system' ... 'asset management in IT Operations. Knowing who has which laptop, when…”
source unavailable
M Maturity
75“api.releases: latest tag v8.8.0 published 2026-09-30; latest_commit 2026-10-04; README: 'actively developed and we release quite…”
source unavailable
grokability/snipe-it looks like a candidate for web applications (self-hostable); AGPL-3.0 caps S at 25; fail-closed dimension rule applied.
Use it with
Selected: Gloo AI Studio
Tool names and logos belong to their owners; shown so you can pick your own client. Not affiliated.
Step 1 — Connect Refinry once (prompt only)
Gloo AI Studio does not document external MCP server setup. Use this prompt with the copied Refinry research brief in Studio.
https://studio.ai.gloo.com/I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s plain-language agent feed — https://refinry.dev/docs.md — then help me evaluate grokability/snipe-it: summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Some clients need manual setup. Follow the plain-language steps on the Docs page.
Step 2 — Plan your first step
Tell the AI what you want to do; edit this to match your situation.
I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s public review of grokability/snipe-it (https://refinry.dev) and help me assess it for using grokability/snipe-it for web applications (self-hostable) in my ministry. Summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites, separating reviewed evidence from what still needs verification. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Prefer a hand-off that works without a connection? Copy the research brief: every reviewed fact, all caution flags, and a feasibility-only first assignment.
S Security / License
25license 25 · security 75
“api.repos.license.spdx_id: 'AGPL-3.0' (restrictive for SaaS/redistribution). Security: osv_vulns [], security_md present 'SECURITY.md'…”
source unavailable
A Ease of Adoption
75dev 75 · volunteer 75
“README: 'check out the installation manual', 'requirements documentation', 'we have a Docker image available', 'Check out the live demo…”
source unavailable
C Community Trust
75“api.repos: stargazers 15005, forks 4009; contributors snipe (18459), marcusmoore (2401), Godmartinz (1181); README 'all_contributors-331'…”
source unavailable
I AI-Agent Integrability
50“README accurate with Installation, User's Manual, Upgrading, Bug Reports sections; SPDX license via api.repos.license.spdx_id 'AGPL-3.0'…”
source unavailable