U Ministry Utility
50“"A simple, web-based church presentation system" with "Load next/previous song" and "Send preview to live" — directly serves worship…”
source unavailable
jaitaiwan/CPresent
Simplified, web-based church presentation system.
Trust Score
29.2
Last full review 2026-09-24 · Trust Score decays −2 points per month without a fresh review (never below 20)
security cap applied — score capped at 45U Ministry Utility
50“"A simple, web-based church presentation system" with "Load next/previous song" and "Send preview to live" — directly serves worship…”
source unavailable
M Maturity
25“Latest commit 2024-03-12 within 12 months [api.repos pushed_at], but "no tagged release found" [api.releases] and README states "Release…”
source unavailable
31.2 → 31.2 (+0.0 over window)
ranked #7 of 10 in M3
jaitaiwan/CPresent looks like a candidate for worship presentation; unfetched: contributors — contributor breakdown not in pack; bus-factor cannot be confirmed but single-PR merge pattern suggests low contributor diversity.
Use it with
Selected: Gloo AI Studio
Tool names and logos belong to their owners; shown so you can pick your own client. Not affiliated.
Step 1 — Connect Refinry once (prompt only)
Gloo AI Studio does not document external MCP server setup. Use this prompt with the copied Refinry research brief in Studio.
https://studio.ai.gloo.com/I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s plain-language agent feed — https://refinry.dev/docs.md — then help me evaluate jaitaiwan/CPresent: summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Some clients need manual setup. Follow the plain-language steps on the Docs page.
Step 2 — Plan your first step
Tell the AI what you want to do; edit this to match your situation.
I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s public review of jaitaiwan/CPresent (https://refinry.dev) and help me assess it for using jaitaiwan/CPresent for worship presentation in my ministry. Summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites, separating reviewed evidence from what still needs verification. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Prefer a hand-off that works without a connection? Copy the research brief: every reviewed fact, all caution flags, and a feasibility-only first assignment.
S Security / License
25license 75 · security 25
“License: "license.spdx_id": "MIT" [api.repos] — permissive. Security: "unfetched: security posture" — no SECURITY.md, no Dependabot, no…”
source unavailable
A Ease of Adoption
25dev 50 · volunteer 25
“README provides install steps ("npm install ." then "sudo node ./index.js") but requires manual MongoDB setup, manual database creation…”
source unavailable
C Community Trust
25“38 stars, 11 forks [api.repos] but no evidence of external contributors beyond one PR ("#33 from `56206_open_serve`.`meichthys`/patch-1"…”
source unavailable
I AI-Agent Integrability
25“README is sparse but parseable with install/use sections and keyboard shortcuts; license identifiable via api.repos as MIT; no API…”
source unavailable