U Ministry Utility
25“README: "Lauren Tan's pstack ... is an opinionated Cursor skill stack that improves agent outcomes. This is a port for Claude Code, Codex…”
source unavailable
michael-denyer/pstack-claude
Claude Code, Codex, Pi, OpenCode, Gemini, and Prime Agent versions of Poteto's pstack. Rigorous agent workflows with Cursor primitives translated for other harnesses.
Trust Score
45.0
Last full review 2026-10-06 · Trust Score decays −2 points per month without a fresh review (never below 20)
security cap applied — score capped at 45U Ministry Utility
25“README: "Lauren Tan's pstack ... is an opinionated Cursor skill stack that improves agent outcomes. This is a port for Claude Code, Codex…”
source unavailable
M Maturity
75“api.releases: "latest tag v0.9.67 published 2026-10-04"; latest_commit 2026-10-04; api.repos: "archived": false, open_issues 10; README…”
source unavailable
michael-denyer/pstack-claude looks like a candidate for ai, agents & mcp servers; Ministry category general-only justified: repo is agent-workflow tooling with zero ministry functionality (U fail-closed vs generous category hints).
Use it with
Selected: Gloo AI Studio
Tool names and logos belong to their owners; shown so you can pick your own client. Not affiliated.
Step 1 — Connect Refinry once (prompt only)
Gloo AI Studio does not document external MCP server setup. Use this prompt with the copied Refinry research brief in Studio.
https://studio.ai.gloo.com/I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s plain-language agent feed — https://refinry.dev/docs.md — then help me evaluate michael-denyer/pstack-claude: summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Some clients need manual setup. Follow the plain-language steps on the Docs page.
Step 2 — Plan your first step
Tell the AI what you want to do; edit this to match your situation.
I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s public review of michael-denyer/pstack-claude (https://refinry.dev) and help me assess it for using michael-denyer/pstack-claude for ai, agents & mcp servers in my ministry. Summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites, separating reviewed evidence from what still needs verification. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Prefer a hand-off that works without a connection? Copy the research brief: every reviewed fact, all caution flags, and a feasibility-only first assignment.
S Security / License
25license 75 · security 25
“api.repos.license.spdx_id: "MIT" (permissive); security: "unfetched: SECURITY.md/dependabot/CodeQL/OSV not in pack" — no security…”
source unavailable
A Ease of Adoption
50dev 75 · volunteer 50
“README: "/plugin marketplace add michael-denyer/pstack-claude" and "/plugin install pstack@pstack-claude" — near one-command for harness…”
source unavailable
C Community Trust
50“api.repos: "stargazers_count": 1281, "forks_count": 145, "open_issues_count": 10 with active triage implied by recent merge "Update README…”
source unavailable
I AI-Agent Integrability
75“README: plugin/marketplace install across five harnesses, structured docs ("docs/reference.md#shared-skills-installation"), skills with…”
source unavailable