U Ministry Utility
25“README: 'Phosphor is a flexible icon family for interfaces, diagrams, presentations — whatever, really.' No ministry-specific features; a…”
source unavailable · fetched 2026-10-04
phosphor-icons/web
A flexible icon family for the web
Trust Score
52.5
Last full review 2026-10-06 · Trust Score decays −2 points per month without a fresh review (never below 20)
U Ministry Utility
25“README: 'Phosphor is a flexible icon family for interfaces, diagrams, presentations — whatever, really.' No ministry-specific features; a…”
source unavailable · fetched 2026-10-04
M Maturity
50“api.releases: latest tag v2.1.2 published 2025-03-31; latest_commit 2026-01-06 'chore(docs): sync readme section'; api.repos pushed_at…”
source unavailable
phosphor-icons/web looks like a candidate for design, templates & themes; No ministry lane fits generously; icons are general web/design assets (G9 Design, Templates & Themes).
Use it with
Selected: Gloo AI Studio
Tool names and logos belong to their owners; shown so you can pick your own client. Not affiliated.
Step 1 — Connect Refinry once (prompt only)
Gloo AI Studio does not document external MCP server setup. Use this prompt with the copied Refinry research brief in Studio.
https://studio.ai.gloo.com/I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s plain-language agent feed — https://refinry.dev/docs.md — then help me evaluate phosphor-icons/web: summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Some clients need manual setup. Follow the plain-language steps on the Docs page.
Step 2 — Plan your first step
Tell the AI what you want to do; edit this to match your situation.
I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s public review of phosphor-icons/web (https://refinry.dev) and help me assess it for using phosphor-icons/web for design, templates & themes in my ministry. Summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites, separating reviewed evidence from what still needs verification. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Prefer a hand-off that works without a connection? Copy the research brief: every reviewed fact, all caution flags, and a feasibility-only first assignment.
S Security / License
75license 100 · security 75
“api.repos.license.spdx_id: 'MIT' (permissive, package published on npm). security: osv_vulns: [], CI bot contributor (github-actions[bot])…”
source unavailable
A Ease of Adoption
75dev 75 · volunteer 75
“README gives copy-paste CDN snippet: 'Simply add one or more weights by including its stylesheet to the document <head>, and drop in icons…”
source unavailable
C Community Trust
50“api.repos: 529 stars, 38 forks; api.contributors shows external human ThatOneCalculator (2 contributions) besides maintainer; 'Explore all…”
source unavailable
I AI-Agent Integrability
50“README: accurate usage docs with install/use sections, versioned CDN links 'npm/@phosphor-icons/web@2.1.2', clear class-name API. No…”
source unavailable