U Ministry Utility
25“"LaTeX facsimile of a Bible de Genève, 1564" (api.repos.description) — a historical Bible typesetting project, not a ministry workflow…”
source unavailable
raphink/geneve_1564
LaTeX facsimile of a Bible de Genève, 1564
Trust Score
25.5
Last full review 2026-09-24 · Trust Score decays −2 points per month without a fresh review (never below 20)
security cap applied — score capped at 45U Ministry Utility
25“"LaTeX facsimile of a Bible de Genève, 1564" (api.repos.description) — a historical Bible typesetting project, not a ministry workflow…”
source unavailable
M Maturity
25“Latest release tag "2016-06-08_02 published 2016-06-08T14:14:24Z" (api.releases) shows no release in ~10 years; latest commit "2023-02-17"…”
source unavailable
27.5 → 27.5 (+0.0 over window)
ranked #9 of 11 in M9
raphink/geneve_1564 looks like a candidate for ministry data & theology resources; unfetched: contributors — contributor breakdown not in pack; bus-factor cannot be fully assessed.
Use it with
Selected: Gloo AI Studio
Tool names and logos belong to their owners; shown so you can pick your own client. Not affiliated.
Step 1 — Connect Refinry once (prompt only)
Gloo AI Studio does not document external MCP server setup. Use this prompt with the copied Refinry research brief in Studio.
https://studio.ai.gloo.com/I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s plain-language agent feed — https://refinry.dev/docs.md — then help me evaluate raphink/geneve_1564: summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Some clients need manual setup. Follow the plain-language steps on the Docs page.
Step 2 — Plan your first step
Tell the AI what you want to do; edit this to match your situation.
I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s public review of raphink/geneve_1564 (https://refinry.dev) and help me assess it for using raphink/geneve_1564 for ministry data & theology resources in my ministry. Summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites, separating reviewed evidence from what still needs verification. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Prefer a hand-off that works without a connection? Copy the research brief: every reviewed fact, all caution flags, and a feasibility-only first assignment.
S Security / License
25license 25 · security 25
“License: "license.spdx_id": "GPL-3.0" (api.repos) — copyleft, restrictive for ministry SaaS/redistribution. Security: "unfetched…”
source unavailable
A Ease of Adoption
25dev 50 · volunteer 25
“README describes building with "XeLaTeX" and "EB Garamond" font but no install/run docs, no Dockerfile, no package-manager distribution…”
source unavailable
C Community Trust
50“"stargazers_count": 460, "forks_count": 56" (api.repos) with "open_issues_count": 0" and external PR "#6 from…”
source unavailable
I AI-Agent Integrability
25“README is in French with project history but no API/CLI description; "unfetched: openapi/CITATION.cff signals not in pack"; license…”
source unavailable