U Ministry Utility
50“"A knowledge graph of biblical people, places, periods, and passages." and "This data enables smarter search algorithms, new apps, and…”
source unavailable
robertrouse/theographic-bible-metadata
A knowledge graph of biblical people, places, periods, and passages.
Trust Score
34.2
Last full review 2026-09-24 · Trust Score decays −2 points per month without a fresh review (never below 20)
security cap applied — score capped at 45U Ministry Utility
50“"A knowledge graph of biblical people, places, periods, and passages." and "This data enables smarter search algorithms, new apps, and…”
source unavailable
M Maturity
25“"no tagged release found" — api.releases; latest commit "Add files via upload" at 2026-04-21 — latest_commit. Active within 6 months but no…”
source unavailable
36.2 → 36.2 (+0.0 over window)
ranked #5 of 11 in M9
robertrouse/theographic-bible-metadata looks like a candidate for ministry data & theology resources; unfetched: contributors — contributor breakdown not in pack; bus-factor and multi-maintainer status cannot be assessed.
Use it with
Selected: Gloo AI Studio
Tool names and logos belong to their owners; shown so you can pick your own client. Not affiliated.
Step 1 — Connect Refinry once (prompt only)
Gloo AI Studio does not document external MCP server setup. Use this prompt with the copied Refinry research brief in Studio.
https://studio.ai.gloo.com/I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s plain-language agent feed — https://refinry.dev/docs.md — then help me evaluate robertrouse/theographic-bible-metadata: summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Some clients need manual setup. Follow the plain-language steps on the Docs page.
Step 2 — Plan your first step
Tell the AI what you want to do; edit this to match your situation.
I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s public review of robertrouse/theographic-bible-metadata (https://refinry.dev) and help me assess it for using robertrouse/theographic-bible-metadata for ministry data & theology resources in my ministry. Summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites, separating reviewed evidence from what still needs verification. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Prefer a hand-off that works without a connection? Copy the research brief: every reviewed fact, all caution flags, and a feasibility-only first assignment.
S Security / License
25license 25 · security 25
“License: "CC-BY-SA-4.0" — api.repos.license.spdx_id. CC-BY-SA-4.0 is a copyleft-style license requiring attribution and share-alike…”
source unavailable
A Ease of Adoption
25dev 50 · volunteer 25
“"If your database is capable of importing nested JSON objects, the files in the json folder of this repo are the preferred source. The CSV…”
source unavailable
C Community Trust
50“"stargazers_count": 353, "forks_count": 86 — api.repos. Small real community with forks and stars, but no evidence of named church/ministry…”
source unavailable
I AI-Agent Integrability
50“"Use a GraphQL API to power your Bible websites and mobile apps" and "Complete data documentation, including API information, can be found…”
source unavailable