U Ministry Utility
50“README: "Bible versions and cross-reference databases. MySQL, SQLite, CSV, JSON, YAML, TXT, MD, PARQUET." and "A large and accurate…”
source
scrollmapper/bible_databases
Bible versions and cross-reference databases.
Trust Score
41.2
Last full review 2026-10-06 · Trust Score decays −2 points per month without a fresh review (never below 20)
U Ministry Utility
50“README: "Bible versions and cross-reference databases. MySQL, SQLite, CSV, JSON, YAML, TXT, MD, PARQUET." and "A large and accurate…”
source
M Maturity
25“api.repos pushed_at 2026-07-10 (alive); api.releases: "no tagged release found"; contributors…”
36.2 → 41.2 (+5.0 over window)
ranked #79 of 213 in ALL
scrollmapper/bible_databases looks like a candidate for data & text corpora; No tagged release ever — M capped at 25 despite recent commits (2026-07-10).
Use it with
Selected: Gloo AI Studio
Tool names and logos belong to their owners; shown so you can pick your own client. Not affiliated.
Step 1 — Connect Refinry once (prompt only)
Gloo AI Studio does not document external MCP server setup. Use this prompt with the copied Refinry research brief in Studio.
https://studio.ai.gloo.com/I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s plain-language agent feed — https://refinry.dev/docs.md — then help me evaluate scrollmapper/bible_databases: summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Some clients need manual setup. Follow the plain-language steps on the Docs page.
Step 2 — Plan your first step
Tell the AI what you want to do; edit this to match your situation.
I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s public review of scrollmapper/bible_databases (https://refinry.dev) and help me assess it for using scrollmapper/bible_databases for data & text corpora in my ministry. Summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites, separating reviewed evidence from what still needs verification. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Prefer a hand-off that works without a connection? Copy the research brief: every reviewed fact, all caution flags, and a feasibility-only first assignment.
S Security / License
50license 75 · security 50
“api.repos.license.spdx_id "MIT"; security: osv_vulns []; security_md present:false; no Dependabot/SAST/pinning evidence in pack — basic…”
source unavailable
A Ease of Adoption
25dev 50 · volunteer 25
“README: "Find the bible versions you are looking for in the [Formats Folder](./formats)" and conversion scripts in "[Scripts…”
source unavailable
C Community Trust
50“api.repos: 1698 stars, 549 forks; api.contributors shows three distinct logins (LeoBlanchette, scrollmapper, thesnarky1); open_issues_count…”
source unavailable
I AI-Agent Integrability
50“README accurately describes structure: "Formats Folder", "Sources Folder", "Scripts Folder", docs link; MIT identifiable via…”
source unavailable