U Ministry Utility
50“README: 'This small Rubygem does its best at taking a user-input string like "john 3:16" and turning it into something useful for querying…”
source
seven1m/bible_ref
Parser for bible passage/ranges
Trust Score
41.2
Last full review 2026-10-06 · Trust Score decays −2 points per month without a fresh review (never below 20)
U Ministry Utility
50“README: 'This small Rubygem does its best at taking a user-input string like "john 3:16" and turning it into something useful for querying…”
source
M Maturity
25“api.repos pushed_at 2026-03-17 (recent commit); api.releases 'no tagged release found'; api.contributors top is single dominant author…”
seven1m/bible_ref looks like a candidate for data & text corpora; No tagged release found (unfetched-or-none) caps maturity at 25.
Use it with
Selected: Gloo AI Studio
Tool names and logos belong to their owners; shown so you can pick your own client. Not affiliated.
Step 1 — Connect Refinry once (prompt only)
Gloo AI Studio does not document external MCP server setup. Use this prompt with the copied Refinry research brief in Studio.
https://studio.ai.gloo.com/I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s plain-language agent feed — https://refinry.dev/docs.md — then help me evaluate seven1m/bible_ref: summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Some clients need manual setup. Follow the plain-language steps on the Docs page.
Step 2 — Plan your first step
Tell the AI what you want to do; edit this to match your situation.
I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s public review of seven1m/bible_ref (https://refinry.dev) and help me assess it for using seven1m/bible_ref for data & text corpora in my ministry. Summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites, separating reviewed evidence from what still needs verification. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Prefer a hand-off that works without a connection? Copy the research brief: every reviewed fact, all caution flags, and a feasibility-only first assignment.
S Security / License
50license 75 · security 50
“api.repos license.spdx_id 'MIT' and README 'Licensed MIT.'; security.osv_vulns [] (clean OSV), security_md present:false, no…”
source unavailable
A Ease of Adoption
25dev 50 · volunteer 25
“README shows clear Ruby usage examples ('BibleRef::Reference.new(...).ranges') — developer-adoptable; but it is a Rubygem with no…”
source unavailable
C Community Trust
50“api.contributors includes external contributors 'SquirrelHub, contributions: 3' and 'adamtootle, 2'; api.repos forks_count 16…”
source unavailable
I AI-Agent Integrability
50“README has accurate usage section with copy-paste Ruby examples ('ref.normalize # "John 3:16"') and identifiable license ('Licensed MIT.')…”
source unavailable