U Ministry Utility
25“README: 'is an end-to-end testing framework for web and mobile apps. Describe a goal in natural language and an agent drives the app to…”
source unavailable
tester-army/e2e
Next generation e2e testing framework for web and mobile apps.
Trust Score
33.8
Last full review 2026-10-06 · Trust Score decays −2 points per month without a fresh review (never below 20)
security cap applied — score capped at 45U Ministry Utility
25“README: 'is an end-to-end testing framework for web and mobile apps. Describe a goal in natural language and an agent drives the app to…”
source unavailable
M Maturity
50“api.releases: 'latest tag @e2e-dev/web@0.12.0 published 2026-10-04T07:13:55Z'; latest_commit 2026-10-06 'fix(agent): judge fails an…”
source unavailable
tester-army/e2e looks like a candidate for cli & developer tools; unfetched: contributors (blocks M>=75)
Use it with
Selected: Gloo AI Studio
Tool names and logos belong to their owners; shown so you can pick your own client. Not affiliated.
Step 1 — Connect Refinry once (prompt only)
Gloo AI Studio does not document external MCP server setup. Use this prompt with the copied Refinry research brief in Studio.
https://studio.ai.gloo.com/I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s plain-language agent feed — https://refinry.dev/docs.md — then help me evaluate tester-army/e2e: summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Some clients need manual setup. Follow the plain-language steps on the Docs page.
Step 2 — Plan your first step
Tell the AI what you want to do; edit this to match your situation.
I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s public review of tester-army/e2e (https://refinry.dev) and help me assess it for using tester-army/e2e for cli & developer tools in my ministry. Summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites, separating reviewed evidence from what still needs verification. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Prefer a hand-off that works without a connection? Copy the research brief: every reviewed fact, all caution flags, and a feasibility-only first assignment.
S Security / License
0license 75 · security 0
“api.repos.license.spdx_id: 'Apache-2.0'; README badge 'License: Apache-2.0'. Security: pack states 'unfetched…”
source unavailable
A Ease of Adoption
50dev 50 · volunteer 50
“README: 'npx e2e init' one-command scaffold with 'writes a config and an example test', plus 'quickstart covers the rest' and 'examples/…”
source unavailable
C Community Trust
25“api.repos: 'stargazers_count: 5466, forks_count: 236'; README 'GitHub Trending Repository of the Day' badge and Discord link. Stars are one…”
source unavailable
I AI-Agent Integrability
75“README: SPDX-identifiable license badge 'License: Apache-2.0', install/use sections ('Quick start', code sample `import { test, expect }…”
source unavailable