U Ministry Utility
25“README: 'Instant messaging full stack. Backend in pure Go... clients for Android (Java), iOS (Swift), and web (ReactJS)...' — generic…”
source unavailable
tinode/chat
Instant messaging platform. Backend in Go. Clients: Swift iOS, Java Android, JS webapp, scriptable command line; chatbots
Trust Score
40.0
Last full review 2026-10-06 · Trust Score decays −2 points per month without a fresh review (never below 20)
U Ministry Utility
25“README: 'Instant messaging full stack. Backend in pure Go... clients for Android (Java), iOS (Swift), and web (ReactJS)...' — generic…”
source unavailable
M Maturity
50“api.releases: latest tag v0.25.3 published 2026-07-04; api.repos: pushed_at 2026-09-27; README: 'This is beta-quality software…”
source unavailable
tinode/chat looks like a candidate for communication; License GPL-3.0 restricts redistribution for ministry SaaS ambitions.
Use it with
Selected: Gloo AI Studio
Tool names and logos belong to their owners; shown so you can pick your own client. Not affiliated.
Step 1 — Connect Refinry once (prompt only)
Gloo AI Studio does not document external MCP server setup. Use this prompt with the copied Refinry research brief in Studio.
https://studio.ai.gloo.com/I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s plain-language agent feed — https://refinry.dev/docs.md — then help me evaluate tinode/chat: summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Some clients need manual setup. Follow the plain-language steps on the Docs page.
Step 2 — Plan your first step
Tell the AI what you want to do; edit this to match your situation.
I am choosing open-source software for my ministry using Refinry, a review site. Read Refinry’s public review of tinode/chat (https://refinry.dev) and help me assess it for using tinode/chat for communication in my ministry. Summarize the Trust Score, the strongest and weakest dimensions, and any caution flags it cites, separating reviewed evidence from what still needs verification. Give me one small first step I can complete this week, and tell me honestly if this looks like more than I can handle.
Prefer a hand-off that works without a connection? Copy the research brief: every reviewed fact, all caution flags, and a feasibility-only first assignment.
S Security / License
50license 50 · security 50
“api.repos: license.spdx_id 'GPL-3.0'; security: osv_vulns [] and security_md present; no evidence of dependency scanning or SAST.”
source unavailable
A Ease of Adoption
25dev 50 · volunteer 25
“README: 'Follow instructions (INSTALL.md) to install and run or use one of the cloud services below.' — clear install docs but no…”
source unavailable
C Community Trust
50“api.repos: stargazers_count 13525, forks_count 2084; api.contributors: top contributors include or-else (3307), Googlom (162), aforge…”
source unavailable
I AI-Agent Integrability
50“README: 'Read API documentation (docs/API.md)' and 'Read configuration instructions contained in the tinode.conf file.' — API docs present…”
source unavailable